Saturday, March 29, 2008

The entrepreneurial mind: musicians as artisans

There are bloggers everywhere interested in whats happening to the music industry.

I think a lot of it is about recognising what happens to an industry once technology allows it to go fully digital, because everything thats happening to CD's . . . well the DVD is right behind it . . . and who knows what we'll be able to fit down the phone line in 10 years . . .

This from Professor Cornwall's "Entrepreneurial mind" blog.



The music industry is facing an interesting puzzle these days How do you run a business where customers do not want to pay and they do not want advertising? From today's Tennessean:

Efforts to sell music by subscription have mainly failed.
Yahoo recently gave up on its Music Unlimited subscription service and sent its customers to Rhapsody, another struggling music provider.

But traditional radio's offer of free music surrounded by audio advertising also is being rejected by a generation that resents undesirable interruptions.

"They want to be the program director, and they insist that the program be free," says Jerry Del Colliano, a professor of music industry at the University of Southern California and a former executive at Top 40 WIBG in Philadelphia.

The big boys in the industry do what big boys do in any industry undergoing fundamental change -- they try to get the government to protect their interests. From TechCrunch (via Andy Tabar):

Warner Music, fully aware that the days of charging for recorded music are coming to an end, is now pushing for a music tax.
This isn’t the first time someone has called for a music tax. Peter Jenner argued for it in Europe in 2006. Trent Reznor said the same thing last year (as did the Songwriters Association of Canada)....

But Warner Music is doing more than just talking about a music tax. They’ve hired industry veteran Jim Griffin to create a new entity that would create a pool of money from user fees to be distributed to artists and copyright holders.

We may be witnessing the end of the structure of the music industry as we know it. The mass produced, mass marketed music is becoming a relic of the past. And what does the future hold?

The predictions from the Institutue for the Future about the future of small business might offer a glimpse into the future of music:

Today, there are 26 million small businesses in the U.S. that generate roughly $5 trillion in annual sales. If they were a country that would make them the 2nd largest economy in the world! Those numbers will continue to grow over the next decade as small businesses re-emerge as artisans with even more economic force.
Artisans, historically defined as skilled craftsmen who fashioned goods by hand, will re-emerge as an influential force in the coming decade. These next-gen artisans will craft their goods and shape the economy -- through upswings and downturns -- with an effect reaching far beyond their neighborhoods, or even their nations. They'll work differently than their medieval counterparts, combining brain with brawn as advances in technology and the reaches of globalization give them greater opportunities to succeed.
What would a musical artisan look like? Probably a lot like James Lee Stanley.

My wife and I first heard James Lee Stanley at a "coffee house" in the 1970s when we were attending the University of Wisconsin -- Stevens Point (WAY up north!!). James Lee was one of many songwriters who made the circuit performing on college campuses at coffee house events. (As a note of Entrepreneurial Mind trivia, I played in a couple of coffee house sessions myself). The songwriters/musicians got a small payment from the school and were allowed to sell their record albums (for the younger generation -- that is what we used to call "vinyl").

Fast forward to 2008. One of my winter projects was to convert many of our old vinyl albums into digital. When I got to our collection of records from our coffee house days, I decided to "Google" the songwriters to see what happened to them. Many had faded into obscurity before the Internet was able to immortalize them in digital splendor.

James Lee Stanley on the other hand was alive and well and still making the circuit. He had survived as an artisan in the music industry. He's got a website. And he has a blog offering "tips, hints, clues and info for the artist in us all." His blog chronicles the life of a musical artisan offering his thoughts on touring, performing, writing, studio work, contracts, stringing guitars, and so forth. He still writes music, still records and still tours.

Why does he continue to perform for well over thirty years? Not for possible fame and not for financial wealth.

What I know is that following your bliss is more rewarding than making a bunch of money at something you absolutely hate doing. I don’t feel that I’ve wasted my life or that I could have been more successful at something else. I love what I do and I love trying to get better at it and I love it that at my stage of life I still have so much passion for what I do and I love how vibrant and alive it keeps me.
So what is the future of the music industry? I hope it is not an industry propped up by government intervention as Warner Music would have it.

Instead, I hope that it is an industry sustained by talented artists -- and successful artisans -- who help us understand love, heart ache, happiness, sadness, joy, despair. I hope it is full of people like James Lee Stanley, whose view of success in his career is one we all can learn something from, be we musicians or be we entrepreneurs.

No comments: